TBT 2009 - Comments about the Object: (User 1)


- Living with it interfered with the space.

- The sensation is smooth and pleasant.

- Pleasing and beautiful

- Exists an absence more than presence:

A non-space because of what surrounds it. Provokes visual interference, surrounds the space, (transitory in its essence). By accepting it is a rejection per se (something to be dealt with)

- The packaged of it, was relevant due to the limited period of time in the house (was near the Box as if the Box was going to leave in the following day).

- Temporality and supportive/engaging. (Find a balance in between)

- Integration of the box and them with the space is an unconscious process.

- Wanting to spend every time with the Box, supporting physically.

- Time has effect. Affects the box (A fast engagement)

- Establish a connection with it by sitting side by side.

- Is not a work of art but part of it! (They complete the work in some way)

- Allowing people to engage with it makes them think how to receive it and think about the level of expectation in art; (allow the function of the artwork to engage).

TBT 2009 - Comments about the Object: (User 2)


-The object was used as a table during its stay in the house.

- The textile function of the object was also very appealing.

- The object had for them the remembrance of an old suitcase but still a reference to a functional object. Made them think of something inspiring and at the same time romantic.

- One of them used as his own desk for a couple of hours. (They tried to emphasize the functionality and its use).

- Their intervention worked in some way as a written statement a document made for themselves and by themselves.

- The impact of the box in the room was notorious because it didn’t change the spatial organization but it transformed the way they perceived it. In same vague sense was a reunion, inspiring and even healthy.

- Due to all these qualities the box was reserved to create a special occasion and to enjoy the short period of time they had with the box.

- It also worked as a diary of their lives that in some way works as a testimony of what will certainty leave some affection behind.

- However the changes happened to in their lives even if it was for a night. The functionality of the box, worked also as a break in their routine provoking a relationship directly with something more than just a box.

- The experience itself turned out to be different and promoter of new things and happenings in their lives.

TBT 2009 - Comments about the Object: (user 3)


- The box was very appealing when it was unwrapped, but there was also a questioning between being a box or a cube in conceptual terms.

- There was an interest in naming it because it was there were several possibilities to go with the box.

- They faced the object as an object so they felted restrained in doing something to the box.

- They used it as a support base, to make it functional.

- in some way the box made part of the family for while, and was created a relation even thought the object itself remained strange to them. The presence of it was a bit frightening because of its size.

- There was a slight contradiction in their behaviour with the object because in one hand it was almost like a sense of loss but in the other hand there was a kind of affection. It is also interesting how the object even thought it didn’t suffered any intervention it became an active object that completed some kind of gap.

- There was also the interest of going for a walk with the box and trying to interact with it in specific places. However the idea didn’t happen!

- At the same time there was a need to not engage with it, because it is something that an ordinary object would not require from you!

- The box had a lot of dust in it.

- The box has also the power to precede you into the room as something that was dislocated.

- Nevertheless there was a creation of a relation due to the box being attractive to them. The physicality of it and its basic and tactile attributes it was not divorced from them because they felt it belonged to the everyday world. Another point that was considered was that it was something natural and very practical to accept.

- There was an objectification of the box diminishing it. The object itself becomes an accumulation of space that seems to belong to place but still does not belong. Remains alienated. There seems to exist a boundary that keeps us to still keep close but at the same time distant from it.

- In some way part of our lives were brought as close as possible because of a need of interacting

- it is also relevant to say with no apparent intention there was created an aura in the object because they felt they could project anything to the box as long as the box remained with no intervention. Afterwards it becomes difficult and there is also other aspect that once the box itself becomes intervened until the point whether it loses its integrity!

TBT 2009 - Comments about the Object: (user 4)


- They felt that the smell, touch and smoothness were very important factors to their engagement with the box because conditioned their interaction in order to reflect their interactions within the three characteristics.

- However they were concerned in leaving one side of the box clear because they felt people should have the same experience they had by touching and smelling it.

- The interventions in the box were a consequence of a gathering of people mainly friends around the box. As consequence of this they were tempted to think outside the box and analyze their experiences.

- There was a suggestion of making a suitcase, putting wheels, making a plinth, a skate board, walk it around the city, but they hadn’t the time to do that.

- The box had appositive effect on people making them work collaboratively and for a common interest.

- Some ideas were generated by the presence of the box in the place. In addition the box was placed in several places according to the needs and interest of the people that wanted to make use of it.

- The box itself incarnated the personality of a tourist that walks around without staying much time in one place but always trying to retain most of his experiences.

- The presence of the box was very prom eminent not only in the actual place but also in their memories as something that found a small corner in their conscious.

- Even though it was a short period of time with the box it was a good opportunity for them to be creative. One of the interventions was with candle works, a DJ stand, drawings and chiselling. All these interventions reflected individual instincts that pervaded instead of consideration. According to them this characteristic caused the awareness that the box was already part of them in some way but nevertheless it remained in some way a bizarre object but very appealing and receptive to everyone!

TBT 2009 - Comments about the Object: (user 5)


- First reaction was that it had a funny smell.

- The Box represented a distraction and an object that was very intriguing because its presence was very unusual.

- They used as a functional with several functions such as a seat and lather. They also wrote in the object with commentaries very intriguing about the purpose of the project.

- One of them asked what the point of the project was because there was a dialog very effusive about their beliefs.

- There was some investigation about how the box was made and why which resulted in several questions and debates.

- The debate was mainly about modern art and that led to several conversations about modern art.

- The box didn’t facilitate much communication between co-workers because they were already very close with each other. The box gave a new ambiance to the space because it enables them to be confronted by almost an alien that entered their lives for a period of time.

- In addition the fact that the environment of a working space was very restrictive they tried to make use of it in different ways.

TBT 2009 - Comments about the Object: (user 6)


- The surface is very appealing and beautiful, even inspiring, which let the ‘temporary owner’ quite perplex about the power of such feelings.

- The presence of the box was in some way quite unsettling. For instance the fact that the box didn’t open and still remains as a box.

- There was a feeling that the box even though was not destroyed it was in other hand vandalized by the multiple interventions.

- The intervention on the box was paintings that were similar to stamps. The paintings were small animals one of them was from Latin America, and in together with the paintings there was phrases written in Spanish and in English making reference to the paintings.

- The box presence was very stimulating because it had connotations with bad things such as ‘I am going to be boxed in’ or ‘they are going to take me away in a box’ associated with the image of death and coffins. In addition the temporary owner made reference to a poem that refers to being boxed in the Second World War[i]. On the other hand it was associated with good things such as presents or the Boxing Day when Christmas presents are opened.

- The box allowed a feeling of freedom that was only overcome after a few days since it was a kind of alien in their place. It was a slightly worrying for them to accept it because there was a sense of obligation to work with it. However after overcome the freedom allowed the temporary owner to even be ironic in its interventions.

- The result was in some way the imprint of a statement in the box of their egos while living with it. Nevertheless this attitude reveals a sense of identity by living their fingerprints quite literally or just metaphorically.

- The impact in the space was not much relevant because the house as they described was almost a building site, so it didn’t disturb any kind of harmony!

- In the end there was a slight affection by the box due to its presence even though if it was for a very short period of time.


[i] VII

Jumbled in one common box

Of their dark stupidity,

Orchid, swan, and Caesar lie;

Time that tires of everyone

Has corroded all the locks

Thrown away the key for fun.

In its cleft the torrent mocks

Prophets who in days gone by

Made a profit on each cry,

Persona grata now with none;

And a jackass language shocks

Poets who can only pun.

Silence Settles on the clocks;

Nursing mothers point a sly

Index finger at a sky,

Crimson in the setting sun;

In the valley of the fox

Gleams the barrel of a gun.

Once we could have made the docks,

Now it is too late to fly;

Once too often you and I

Did what we should not have done;

Round the rampant rugged rocks

Rude and ragged rascals run.

Song by W. H. Auden, 1941

Sunday, 22 March 2009

(Assembly) - Motionless Community

Is Society prepared to take a step further!?

Politics of time as a dictatorship dictated by us, to us!?

All of these questions were posed to the reader in the last two essays not as a threat but as a reminder. The essays were intentionally made to question the readers of what surrounds them.

Despite questions were made, no suggestions were received as reply, which left me in a state of both inefficiency and amazement!

The installed commodity and lack of pro-activeness urges me to reflect the role of community that is already largely analyzed in the blog ‘Touch and Be Touched’ as a connection with Art. Nevertheless today I would like to simply take in consideration the community problem, from a humble perspective.

On the basis that bonds are achieved by communication, communities were formed throughout the civilized world. It may be contested that it is pure speculation, but the wellbeing of a community is achieved by the creation of bonds. It may be used as example the Greek culture, which used in its urban plans Agora, as a gathering point to discuss politics or simply to trade products.

However communication alone is not the key for being successful in making a community or establishing a bond. This means we ought to be more receptive towards other people than we are. The consequence of this lack of openness leads to the conclusion that people are afraid of being exposed to an outside world that is unknown to them. This reaction is of no surprise to me and for you since it makes part of our human nature to be afraid of the unknown. Nevertheless this is not the main problem. As far as I am concerned the problem is in the Ego of people that makes them choose not to be open to other people, resulting in Egoism! This awareness is in some way a culture of fear that we inflict in ourselves, which originates conflicts unnecessarily, simply because we restrain our power of will to know the unknown!

Marcus Coates¹ an artist that is participating in the exhibition ‘ALTERMODERN’², with ‘The Plover’s Wing’ 2008, created an amazing metaphor by telling his encounter with a Plover³ and his approach to it, in order to find an answer to an Israeli Major. “Coates seeks to find solutions for an Israeli major who is concerned about the future of the local youth in the face of the continuing violence in the region”. The metaphor is around the fact that Plover’s when faced with a threat to their nests fakes a broken wing and goes in an opposite direction of the nest in order to distract the possible predator. However Coates when was trying to approach the Plover even though not being a threat, the Plover had the same reaction as if Coates was a Predator. In the end the conclusion was that the Israeli youth are trying to rebel themselves against something that they don’t know.

The same case applies to a society that is unable to be receptive to the other because they don’t want to!

In addition this kind of approach besides being violent, neglects everything that is besides their sphere of their understanding, causing conflicts that are unnecessary. Other cause is the fact that people seem to be dormant in a state of apathy! We can’t face life as a mere existence that passes through us until our death! Albert Camus⁴ exposes in one of his most famous novels L’Étranger 1942, the absurdity and an existential line of a character life that seems to be an alienated and anomic⁵ man from what surrounds him.

We can’t take this kind of approach and let death rejoin us!

We can’t let die a sense of immanence between everyone and enclose ourselves in the simple and sad alienation or Can we!?


1 http://www.frieze.com/issue/article/focus_marcus_coates
“Marcus Coates asks what is to be human by experimenting with ‘being’ an animal. Through his interests in ornithology, zoology and anthropology, Coates has developed skills to bypass his own humanness in order to experience the world through the mind and body of an animal. He often adopts a shamanic role to access a nether world populated by birds and animals. By connecting with their spirits, he attempts to gain insight into difficult problems on behalf of the public.” Exhibition Guide Altermodern Exhibition
2 Exhibition «AlterModern» at Tate Britain, Tate Triennial 3 February – 26 April http://www.tate.org.uk/britain/exhibitions/altermodern/
3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plover
4 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Camus
5 Anomic, in contemporary English Language is a sociological term that signifies in individuals an erosion, diminution or absence of personal norms, standards or values, and increased states of psychological normlessness. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anomie
Publicized by Pedro Lopes em 3/22/2009 05:36:00 pm
labels:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)